Weekly Update: Obama: Catch Me If You Can | Judicial Watch

Weekly Update: Obama: Catch Me If You Can | Judicial Watch
Obama Administration’s Secret Email Scandal
I cannot remember a time quite like this. Approximately one-third of congressional committees are investigating Obama corruption; every day brings with it a new scandal, each just as serious as the last.
There just is no other way to put it. The District of Columbia is drowning in a cesspool of corruption. From new scandals, such as the IRS attacks on conservative groups and Benghazi-gate to unresolved outrages from Obama’s first term, including Fast and Furious and Obamacare, the Obama administration is out of control.
And to make matters worse, the president who promised to make transparency and the rule of law the “touchstones” of his presidency has employed every trick in the book to avoid coming clean on any of these scandals.
Just this week, we learned of a new scheme employed by federal officials that allows them to continue to operate in secrecy and beyond the prying eyes of investigators. Per The Associated Press:

Some of President Barack Obama’s political appointees are using internal government email accounts that are separate from their external accounts to conduct official business, The Associated Press found.

The practice could complicate agencies’ legal responsibilities to find and turn over emails under public records requests and congressional inquiries…

White House spokesman Jay Carney on Tuesday acknowledged the practice and said it made eminent sense for Cabinet secretaries and other high-profile officials to have what he called alternative email accounts that wouldn’t fill with unwanted messages….

“There’s nothing secret,” Carney said.

No one is buying what Carney is selling on that point. Carney also noted that these accounts are innocent. Federal employees need them, he explained, to conduct business because their other email addresses are deluged with emails. Whether cluttered in-boxes are a problem inside our federal agencies or not, certainly establishing shadow email accounts is not an appropriate (or ethical) answer.
Here’s why: These secret email accounts allow federal officials to skirt open records laws. And this is a particularly sensitive issue for Judicial Watch, which is the nation’s most aggressive organization using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to force the release of government documents.

If you would like to receive weekly emails updating you about all of our efforts to fight corruption, please sign up here.

* Email
* State:	ALAKASAZARCACOCTDEDCFLGAGUHIIDILINIAKSKYLAMEMHMDMAMIMNMSMOMTNENVNMNHNJNYNCNDOHOKORPARISCSDTNTXUTVTVAWAWVWIWY

Judicial Watch Weekly Update

We are forced to scratch and claw to gain access to every scrap of information, every detail. And to learn that the government can use secret email accounts to further obstruct these efforts is not only frustrating, it is deeply disturbing.
The AP explains the problem further:
Having separate accounts could put an agency in a difficult spot when it is compelled to search for and release emails as part of congressional or internal investigations, civil lawsuits and public records requests. That’s because employees assigned to compile such responses would necessarily need to know about the accounts to search them. Secret accounts also drive perceptions that government officials try to hide actions or decisions.
The size and scope of the problem appears systemic. While the AP says it is still waiting for responses from as many as ten federal agencies regarding their email addresses, Town Hall’s Katie Pavlich has a nice summary of what is publicly known about the agencies involved in these shadow email accounts as of now:

• The Environmental Protection Agency? Check. Lisa Jackson, former head of the EPA reportedly used an alias (Richard Windsor) to conduct official government business and “sidestep disclosure rules.” When AP reporters learned of this secret account, they dug a little deeper, and down the rabbit hole they went, implicating some other federal agencies.

• The Department of Justice? Yep. In fact, head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, the Thomas Perez (of Black Panther scandal fame) reportedly used a private email account on 1,200 occasions. He used this account to “leak information about official business,” concluded the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

• The Obama Labor Department? Seems a good bet, given that Labor reportedly ordered the AP to pay $1 million to gain access to its email addresses, which seems a clear attempt to dissuade the AP from continuing its probe.

• And then there’s Health and Human Services. The HHS response to the AP’s request was suspicious from the start. The agency did, in fact, turn over email addresses, but curiously failed to disclose any addresses for HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. And then when the AP objected to the obfuscation, the agency reluctantly handed over three email addresses for the secretary, one of which they deemed “secret.”

HHS cautioned the AP against disclosing the shadow account, but it fell on deaf ears. The not-so-secret-anymore email address is KGS2@hhs.gov.
The dirty little secret is that the Obama administration typically redacts (blacks out) the email addresses on most documents, making it difficult to decipher who sent or received a particular email or document. And as I told Brietbart.com:

Unless we know about the alias accounts, we can’t accurately analyze Freedom of Information responses. This revelation could impact dozens of our Freedom of Information lawsuits. If we know an email has the address of a senior official, we will look at it carefully. If we don’t, it might be overlooked or, more importantly, we might not go to court over it. With this administration, transparency is a game of “catch me if you can” — even with the courts.

Judicial Watch has filed over 1,100 FOIA requests with the Obama administration and over 100 FOIA lawsuits against it, making it the top public interest FOIA requestor and litigator in the country.
Of course the response from the agencies to these secret email accounts (as exemplified by Carney’s “nothing to see here” defense) is “don’t worry, just trust us.” But how can we? Consider new revelations about yet another Obama appointee scandal/abuse of office.
As reported by Fox News: “House Republicans are expanding their investigation into Health [Health and Human Services] Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ campaign to solicit support for a pro-Obamacare group, after she acknowledged reaching out to companies her agency regulates as part of that effort.”
The Obamacare propaganda group is Enroll America. And the three companies referenced above are Johnson & Johnson, Kaiser Permanente and Ascension Health. Sebelius said she did not troll for checks from these companies, but this assertion remains an open question. She did admit to fundraising from other companies not regulated by her agency.
As you now, JW has been all over the improper efforts by the Obama administration to brainwash the American people into accepting the president’s socialist healthcare overhaul. Whether we are talking about the Obama administration’s taxpayer funded ads featuring television star Andy Griffith, or large chunks of cash paid to expensive public relations firms to persuade the American people to buy Obamacare, the blurred lines between administration policy and outright propaganda are wholly inappropriate. We’re pushing hard to find the full truth on the thoroughly corrupt Sebelius (who made our list of Washington’s “Top Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” in 2012).
Of course, what we know about these efforts is bad enough. But it is what we don’t know – the kind of information likely hiding in secret email accounts within the bowels of the Obama administration – that could do serious and irreparable harm to our institutions of government. That’s what makes these shadow email accounts so dangerous.
Obama Taps Benghazi-Tainted Rice for National Security Advisor
In a shockingly arrogant and irresponsible move, President Obama has nominated Benghazi-tainted UN Ambassador Susan Rice to serve as his National Security Advisor, replacing the outgoing Tom Donilon.
Per The Associated Press:

President Barack Obama’s top national security adviser Tom Donilon is resigning and will be replaced by U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, marking a significant shakeup to the White House foreign policy team…

…Rice, a close Obama confidante, came under withering criticism from Republicans as part of the investigations into the deadly attack on a U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya. Rice, relying on talking points from the intelligence community, said in television interviews that the attacks were likely spontaneous, which was later proven incorrect.

“Proven incorrect,” does not come close to capturing it. Congressional testimony by Benghazi whistleblowers has shown the Obama administration’s response to the attacks to be “a deadly combination of ineptitude, political calculations, and outright lying.”
Remember all of those morning shows, where Rice peddled tall tales about the nature of the Benghazi attacks? Rice (and Clinton) falsely blamed the attack, which led to the death of a U.S. Ambassador and three others, on a rudimentary Internet video mocking Muslims. Not true. We now know this was a terrorist attack pure and simple.
We also know that intelligence officials (including former CIA Director General Petraeus) had noted a link to terrorism in their initial assessments just hours after the attacks. This connection to terrorism was purposely scrubbed from the talking points. Why? I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that this was done to protect President Obama, who was then locked in a tight re-election battle.
A major push of the Obama reelection campaign had been that, under President Obama’s policies, al Qaeda was in decline (“GM is alive and bin Laden is dead” was an Obama campaign slogan.). This was a fair, however debatable, talking point for Obama. But what is not appropriate is lying to the American people about a terrorist attack because it might conflict with this president’s reelection campaign narrative.
Did Rice know the “video explanation” was complete bunk when she took to the morning talk shows? We don’t know for certain. The Obama administration continues to stand in the way of the truth. But whether she knowingly lied or was just a patsy for others in Obama’s inner circle, Rice is most certainly compromised. Who on earth could trust a word out of Rice’s mouth when we know for a fact she peddled a fabricated explanation for the Benghazi attacks?
And now our national security policy is in her hands.
Of course, there is a political angle to the Rice appointment as well. Former Clinton campaign hack James Carville characterized this as an “in your face appointment,” noting that Rice is “not confirmable.” The president initially wanted to have Rice serve as Secretary of State, but Republicans in Congress scuttled those plans. This was payback.
We’ve seen this tactic before with Obama’s czars, right? When President Obama wants to get his “unconfirmable” friends past Congress, he simply installs them. In this case, the appointment does not require Senate confirmation, and Obama is technically within his right to appoint Rice to this post. But it doesn’t make the move smart – or good government.
The liberal press is doing its part to avoid dealing with the controversial nature of this appointment. As media watchdog site NewsBusters points out, The Washington Post played “hide the Benghazi” in its story on the Rice appointment. Readers had to wait until paragraph 20 to see the “B” word, writes NewsButers’ Tim Graham.
How Benghazi gets “paragraph 20” treatment is beyond me. This is one of the most serious scandals in a generation.
And for this reason, Judicial Watch has made it a priority to fight the Obama administration for the full truth on Benghazi. We have multiple Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests pending and three lawsuits trying to get hold of attack videos, information on the fraudulent talking points, and details about a foreign security firm hired to “protect” the consulate and the ambassador.
I guarantee you this: Congress will move on and the media will, too. But your Judicial Watch is in it for the long haul and won’t let this “worse than Watergate” scandal fall by the wayside.
A New Scandal at the IRS
It seems evident that the behemoth Obama administration is setting some new records for wasting taxpayer dollars on ridiculous programs. (Remember the racist “cultural diversity” workshops that required federal employees to chant that our Founding Fathers were illegal aliens?)
And it is particularly offensive when the agency responsible for draining every last cent out of American taxpayers is the very same agency engaging in shameful waste.
Fresh off a “scandal for the ages,” where the Obama IRS abused Tea Party and conservative organizations seeking tax exempt status and subjected conservative donors to retaliatory audits, new details emerged this week about more embarrassing and corrupt activities inside the agency. USA Today had the story:

A division of the Internal Revenue Service spent $4.1 million on a conference in 2010 in Anaheim, Calif., that included “questionable expenses” for keynote speakers, video production and gifts for IRS employees, according to an audit released Tuesday by the Treasury inspector general for tax administration.

The audit found that the IRS held 225 conferences from fiscal years 2010 to 2012 at a cost of $49 million. The Anaheim conference, attended by 2,600 IRS employees, was the driving focus of the audit because it was the most costly during the three-year period of review. The IRS says it has changed spending practices to prevent a recurrence of these incidents.

Now, as is often the case, the devil is in the details here. So let’s take a look at what happened to these public funds. (You can access the TIGTA report here.)
How about $50,187 dollars to craft a Star Trek parody on video? Seem like a wise use of funds to you? How about another video of IRS division managers dancing on stage? Or $44,500 for two speakers, one of whom was paid to create paintings on stage of Michael Jordan and Albert Einstein, among other cultural icons.
Can someone please explain how watching someone paint a picture of a former NBA basketball player contributes to the efficient and proper functioning of a federal agency!
Also among the charges on this trip was a tab of $64,000 to buy gifts (such as plastic squirting fish toys) for IRS employees, two of whom are now no longer with the agency.
Per Fox News:

The IRS placed two employees on administrative leave for accepting hundreds of dollars’ worth of food and gifts at a party in 2010, on the heels of a scathing watchdog report that said the agency blew more than $4 million on the conference where that party was held.

Evidently, the IRS believes it can avoid accountability for its corrupt activities with tepid promises to “do better” and by releasing two low-level employees from their roster. By the way, the Washington Examiner picked up on the fact that this conference was supposed to help “train” new IRS employees hired to implement Obamacare! So this IRS spending scandal is, in reality, an Obamacare scandal!
As you might imagine, there is little sympathy for the IRS in Congress or around the country.
The New York Times reported Thursday morning that the majority of Americans believe the IRS campaign to attack conservative groups was wrong. But check out how the Times reported this data: “Three-fifths of the public think the I.R.S. actions were wrong, but they are evenly divided over whether the targeted inquiries rose to the level of illegality or were just unethical.” Don’t you love the phrase “just unethical?”
The Times also points out that there is an even division as to whether the IRS in Cincinnati acted alone or if the Obama administration was involved. And this week we learned some new details on this question courtesy of The Wall Street Journal via Fox News:

Two IRS employees have provided more details to congressional investigators about how targeting of Tea Party groups in 2010 came from agency officials in Washington, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

Transcripts of interviews with the two employees seem to contradict previous claims by top IRS officials blaming lower-level workers in Cincinnati, The Wall Street Journal reported. While the transcripts don’t suggest Obama administration officials knew of or were involved in the flagging of the groups, questions regarding who ordered the targeting still linger.

Whether President Obama is explicitly or directly to blame for this scandal is still an open question. But as has been pointed out by many, his persistent attempts to defame and undermine the Tea Party movement set the tone for the inappropriate targeting of conservatives on a number of different levels. As President, he is responsible.
Judicial Watch has a number of active Freedom of Information Act investigations into these various matters, and our legal and investigative staff has been appropriately mobilized. I’ll also give you an early heads-up on a panel discussion on June 20 aiming to get more of the truth out about the IRS scandals.

DefaultJudgmentsUSDist.Crt02-0332(Rosenbaum)

 

from Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs by shewolfeagle

Title 31 QuiTam Prosecutorial Misconduct Pensioned Parasites in a Patterned Enterprise for 30 years.
Traffic Ticket Brief
Jan4th,2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN PLEASE RENEW:
Legal Notice of full storage insurance coverage 1-800-Great American Life Insurance Company - Home 643-7882 PO ATP 66699066 Great American
The False Claims Act Doing the best we can unabated by Minnesota State Officials re: US Dist Crt. 02-0332(Rosenbaum), Sharon has been denied her commerce rights now for (4) years. with default judgments against the State's neglience to abate.
Sharon'sBIO HatchRecall Please visit journals & blogs TRUCKERS USA= SHARON ANDERSON dba S.QUALE HAULING with legal notice Steve M. Quale Sr. died or was Murdered in the Sherburne co. Jail ie: Police Chief Dave Warnke 9Feb05.
Sharons Husband was Murdered 21Sept00 Itasca Co. unabated by County Attorneys, Judges VA etc. Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 USCAVC Docket 03-0639 Cpl Anderson Sharon was thrown in the Ramsey & Aitkin Jails Recall Mike Hatch, MNAG C8-01-990, from the AG's OfficeJudges As Criminals? A 23Feb05, exploiting her disabilitys by Senile Judge Leitner,for Murder by Diabetes - News Amundson government pecuniary gain, now in the millions of government coverup of Hazardus Waste Dump, Gravel Pit, Indian Buriel Grounds, Pollution of Gun Lake GunLake Web Site Gun Lake Association, et al., Relators, vs. County of Aitkin, individually and Gun Lake C7-96-2147 SharonsAOL Journal_RESPA s/ Sharon4Ander son's Legal BlogBriefs ATTORNEY PRO SE TELFX:651-776-5835 / ECF:P165913sa1299

Jurisdiction

from Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs by shewolfeagle

JURISDICTION
This civil action arises under the laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota.
This Court has jurisdiction and Plaintiffs herein are alleging standing under:
(1) Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Sections 1961, et seq.;
(2) Title VIII, the Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Pair Housing Amendments Act of 1988,42 U.S.C. Sections 3601, et seq.;
(3) 42 U.S.C. Sections 1981,1982 and 1985; and Case 0:05-cv-00461-JNE-SRN Document 12 Filed 07/21/2005 Page 3 of 66
(4) 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, for violation of the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
The jurisdiction of this Court is authorized by 18 U.S.C. Section 1964 (c), 42 U.S.C.
Section 3613,28 U.S.C. Section 1331 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1343.
This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367, as Plaintiffs are alleging state claims arising from a common nucleus of operative facts with Plaintiffs’ federal claims.
Plaintiffs seek an injunction against Defendants as authorized by 42 U.S.C. Section 36 13 and/or 18 U.S.C. 1961, et seq., and/or 42 U.S.C. Section 1982.

VENUE
Venue herein is proper under 18 U.S.C. Section 1965 (a), 42 U.S.C. Section 3610 (d) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1391(b).

PARTIES

Sep 5, 2007 1:28 AM

Illegal Sale Sharon'sDomicile 1058SummitAveSt.Paul,MN55105

from Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs by shewolfeagle

Subj: Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefsCrimComp v.ColdwellBurnet,JoanJohnsonrealtor Date: 12/11/2005 5:01:27 P.M. Central Standard Time From: Shewolfeagle To: askdoj@usdoj.gov, usaomn.webmaster@usdoj.gov, minneapolis@fbi.gov, oig.hotline@usdoj.gov, Tim.Pawlenty@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, Sharon4Anderson CC: eagledahn1
Legal Notice of Service by e-gov.Sun11Dec05 TO THE ABOVE NAMED: THE Blogs tell the story of RESPA violations currently Flipping again of my Legal Domicile & Homestead at 1058 Summit St. Paul MN 55104-0384 Click here: Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs on the Graves of Tenants in Common Wm O & Bernice A Peterson without Quiet Titles, Just Compensation. File 495722(1988) Criminal Complaintagainst Lesbian Judge Kathleen Gearin who apparantly embellzed over $110,000.00 (1988) file no.495722 (1988)Denied State Law constituing TREASON VOTE Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - 1988
HOMEGROWN/HOMETOWN:2006 MN ATTORNEY-GENERAL Legal ResearchAnalyst TelFx:651-776-5835 MS 284.27 Quiet Title Candidate: shewolfeagle@aol.com Attorney Pro Se,ECF: P165913sa1299 2006 VOTE SHARON ANDERSON AttorneyGeneralMN HOMEGROWN MINNESOTA GAL Castle Coalition: Hands Off My Home Campaign Institute for Justice: Property Rights Cases: New London, CT, Kelo Frank v City ST. Paul MNRICO Lawsuit 7/2007 - Watchdog News Frank v City St.Paul RICO_JURYLawsuit - Watchdog News TITLE 12 . BANKS AND BANKING - TOC Kelo v US 5thTakingEminentDomain Sharon'sBIO MS 508A Titles Registered The Constitution of the United States: Transcription Electronic Filing Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 USCAVC Docket 03-0639 Cpl Anderson STAR Program 1058 Summit BullMN $3Billion VA Widow's redress US Dist.Crt 97-1258(Montgomery)11Order US Dist. Court Ann Montgomery when JR was at Brainard for 1 SharonAnderson'sBlogHomelessPrimer

ShareEmailAdd tags

Sep 5, 2007 1:28 AM

RESPA,Flipping,EquitySkimming

from Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs by shewolfeagle

You've Got Pictures SharonAnderson'sBlogHomelessPrimer
1st Amend US Constution SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - 1988
Illegal Sale of Sharons Domicile, from the Grave Tenants in Common must be made WHOLE.1058 SummitSharonsDomicileBurnetDec2005
without MS 284.27 Quiet Title kELO.natural-rights.org/pdf/kelo-USSC-opinion-6-05.pdf or 5th Amendment Just Compensation "taking clause"Sharon4Anderson@aol.com Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs VA WIDOW ,Forensic,
Legal ResearchAnalyst TelFx:651-776-5835 SharonsE-DemProfile/Bio shewolfeagle@aol.com SharonsBIO SharonScarrellaAndersonUSBriefs - 1988 Attorney Pro Se,ECF: P165913sa1299 2006 VOTE SHARON ANDERSON AttorneyGeneralMN HOMEGROWN MINNESOTA GAL ADA SharonAnderson'sBlogHomelessPrimer VA Widow's redress US Dist. Court Ann Montgomery when JR was at Brainard for 1 US Dist.Crt 97-1258(Montgomery)11Order USDistCrt97-1258(Montgomery)3 Peterson Family Aunti Florence 90 is mighty Living - Buzznet Photo Sharing Com Castle Coalition: Hands Off My Home Campaign Institute for Justice: Property Rights Cases: New London, CT, Kelo Frank v City ST. Paul MNRICO Lawsuit 7/2007 - Watchdog News Frank v City St.Paul RICO_JURYLawsuit - Watchdog News TITLE 12 . BANKS AND BANKING - TOC Kelo v US 5thTakingEminentDomain Sharon'sBIO MS 508A Titles Registered The Constitution of the United States: Transcription Electronic Filing Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 USCAVC Docket 03-0639 Cpl Anderson STAR Program 1058 Summit BullMN $3Billion

MSN Home My MSN Hotmail

Web Search:

\n'));" frameBorder=

	Groups
			Groups Home My Groups Help

Anderson + Advocates

andersonadvocates@www.msnusers.com

What's New Join Now SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON DDAWEB.org Homestead:1058 Summit Legal Domicile 1058 Summit Av Documents Pictures Links COVA030639 SCARRELLAvMIDWEST S&L CourtAccessLufskyetal:C4-85-1848 MinnesotaElectionsJusticesAttryG 2006 SHARON ATTORNEY GENERAL Tools

Bio for Sharon Anderson, Sharon4Anderson@aol.com http://www.sharon4anderson.org/ http://www.sharonanderson.org/ Phyllis Scharrely EF.org, ,City Pages: "She's Punished for Doing Right" ,Title 31 Money Common Law Angels Sharon's Scribd pdf DocMy Documents Scribd: Shewolfeagle http://sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com/ Sharia law: A brief introduction 2010 VOTE SHARON ANDERSON St.Paul Mayor Minnesota Homegrown, Not a Liar or Lawyer,Heritage: Peterson-Hruska-Chergosky-Beckley, 1st. Husband John Scarrella (Army) 2nd. CplJamesRichard Anderson: USMC:1102885 476-26-9032s/ECF:P165913:Pacer:sa1299 Forensic Educational Research 325N.Wilder 2194 MarshallDuplex04 448DesnoyerDuplex04 697 Surrey04 256 Morton W Bill Dahn Duplex04 42USC3631 A TITLE 12 TAX WHISTLEBLOWERS1058 Summit Castle Coalition: Hands Off My Home Campaign Civil False Claims/Qui Tam Page "Stich NY_21 Judges As Criminals?, Defrauding America04, Committment Panel Order VA WIDOW: USCAVCDocket-0639 Sharon L. Anderson 1058 SummitAv/PO Box 4384 St.Paul,MN. Telfx:651-776-5835Salute The Troops& Cpl. Minnesota Statutes 2003, 2.724James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 SharonScarrellaAnderson claim to Faime: re: Scarrella for AssociateJustice: 221NW2d562,PublishedwithoutRoyalitys,orreturn$100fee http://www.courts.state.mn.us/ CommittmentPanelChairedbyLesbianJudges: DATA WAREHOUSING OUR MEDICAL RECORDS TO FRANCE FOR 3 BILLION DOLLARS YEARLS IS TREASON http://www.bull.com Murder by Diabetes - News Amundson Report a Complaint US DOJ HTML Tutorials, Cases and Codes USavis-Dahn Dad & Hatch Aff.Ser.15Sept03SA BIO U.SCopyright Office Sharons Sharon's Mayoral Booklet_17pages Sharon Not Guilty Ticket 04Apr05Conspiracy Pattern FORGOTTEN WARRIOR

Notice: Microsoft has no responsibility for the content featured in this group. Click here for more info. Try MSN Internet Software for FREE! MSN Home My MSN Hotmail Search Feedback Help ©2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Legal Advertise MSN Privacy

Sharons Forensic Evidence CopCorruption Stealing Cars

Picasa Web Albums - Sharon4Anderson @ a... - Cop- Corruption-Minnesota###

Create a portable slideshow for your website, blog, Myspace, etc.

Slideshow options Select slideshow size: Small 144pxMedium 288pxLarge 400pxExtra large 600pxExtra-extra large 800px Show captionsAutoplay HTML Links (for MySpace) Embed slideshow Copy and paste this into your website: <embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://picasaweb.google.com/s/c/bin/slideshow.swf" width="600" height="400" flashvars="host=picasaweb.google.com&captions=1&RGB=0x000000&feed=http%3A%2F%2Fpicasaweb.google.com%2Fdata%2Ffeed%2Fapi%2Fuser%2Fsharon4anderson%2Falbumid%2F5057152273258496417%3Fkind%3Dphoto%26alt%3Drss%26authkey%3DZHqK2V56bTE" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed>

Slideshow preview Need help putting this slideshow on your website?

Sharons DL

You've Got Pictures

Sharon'sDL-ID's

Constitutionality Sharons DL MS171.xx

Legal Eagle SharonAnderson

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Constitutionality Drivers License's Laws MS171.x171.02, Minnesota Statutex MS 645.Canons of Construction

MS 171.16 30 days suspensionMS 546.27_90dayOrder

TO: Larry Dease Court Administrator
Second district home page 651-266-8266 2nd Jud. Dist.

Pursuant to MS2.724

St. Paul Police Chief John Harrington and all others:
Saint Paul Departments and Offices as their interests appear Page -- Saint Paul Police http://www.dps.state.mn.us/

Pursuant to the undersign's request for the docket sheet or written court order TCIS: TO-05-011101 Ticket: 905191492
Status update to claim Default Damages or in the alternative cite Criminally under the Title 15 Commerce & Trade AntiTrust, Civil Rights violations, Election Fraud

US CODE--TITLE 15--COMMERCE AND TRADE US CODE: Title 15,TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE

Sec. 1692k. Civil liability


(a) Amount of damages

Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who
fails to comply with any provision of this subchapter with respect to
any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of--
(1) any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of
such failure;
(2)(A) in the case of any action by an individual, such
additional damages as the court may allow, but not exceeding $1,000;
or
(B) in the case of a class action, (i) such amount for each
named plaintiff as could be recovered under subparagraph (A), and
(ii) such amount as the court may allow for all other class members,
without regard to a minimum individual recovery, not to exceed the
lesser of $500,000 or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt
collector; and
(3) in the case of any successful action to enforce the
foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a
reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court. On a finding
by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad
faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the
defendant attorney's fees reasonable in relation to the work
expended and costs.

(b) Factors considered by court

In determining the amount of liability in any action under
subsection (a) of this section, the court shall consider, among other
relevant factors--
(1) in any individual action under subsection (a)(2)(A) of this
section, the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt
collector, the nature of such noncompliance, and the extent to which
such noncompliance was intentional; or
(2) in any class action under subsection (a)(2)(B) of this
section, the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt
collector, the nature of such noncompliance, the resources of the
debt collector, the number of persons adversely affected, and the
extent to which the debt collector's noncompliance was intentional.

(c) Intent

A debt collector may not be held liable in any action brought under
this subchapter if the debt collector shows by a preponderance of
evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona
fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably
adapted to avoid any such error.

(d) Jurisdiction

An action to enforce any liability created by this subchapter may be
brought in any appropriate United States district court without regard
to the amount in controversy, or in any other court of competent
jurisdiction, within one year from the date on which the violation
occurs.

(e) Advisory opinions of Commission

No provision of this section imposing any liability shall apply to
any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any advisory
opinion of the Commission, notwithstanding that after such act or
omission has occurred, such opinion is amended, rescinded, or determined
by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason.

(Pub. L. 90-321, title VIII, Sec. 813, as added Pub. L. 95-109, Sept.
20, 1977, 91 Stat. 881.)

Section Referred to in Other Sections

This section is referred to in section 1692j of this title.
Damages sought:WAIS Document Retrieval

HairLosscausedby Government Stressupon WeThePeople - Buzznet Photo Sharing Com /s/ Sharon



-----------------
Forwarded Message:

Subj: Caucus Res: Transportation Funding_Constitutionality MS171.02,1RIGHT TO TRAVEL Date: 3/8/2006 10:07:05 A.M. Central Standard Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: greened@obbligato.org, stpaul-issues@forums.e-democracy.org Right-click picture(s) to display picture options

In a message dated 3/7/2006 3:42:24 P.M. Central Standard Time, greened@obbligato.org writes:

Whereas, all Minnesotans must have the access and ability to get to where they need to go, including to jobs, schools, places of worship and civic functions;
http://forums.e-democracy.org/stpaul/contacts/davidgreenebs

AFFIDAVIT RESPONSE: RIGHT TO TRAVEL

WHERE IS THE MONEY COMING FROM?SUBMITTED FOR
EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES IN GOOD FAITH

QUESTION: How many citizens out there have paid $150.00 for a minor Traffic Ticket when Not Guilty,??????

In fighting this Heinous, Bizzare Obstruction of Legal Process: Apr.4th2005, got a Bogus Ticket for ALLEGED Illegal Right Turn on Case & Payne 4 way stop:
" Fully insured, never having an accident or ticket over 30 years" Great Driving record"

Cop: Cyr T. Abraham aka Abrahamson who I found out is Not a Licensed Peace Officer, did not show in court, Sept 2005

then Pensioned Judge Cohen wilfully failed to issue a Written Order to suspend my License , Oct.2005, SECRET COURT TRIAL WITHOUT A JURY,

Olmstead v. US GovLawbreaker

answers/crosscomplaints were not addressed by the City Attorney at that time Cervantes and Judy Hanson Cohens former Court Reporter also the City Attorney concerning 14 E. Jessamine, Housing and with my Demand for Punatitive,Compensatory,Tort Damages over $75 thousand
Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Scrool to the end.
Except as provided in paragraph (b), all questions
of fact and law, and all motions and matters submitted to a
judge for a decision in trial and appellate matters, shall be
disposed of and the decision filed with the court administrator
within 90 days after such
MS 546.27_90dayOrder
CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS:
The undersign cannot get a Limited Drivers License, when under suspension: or a State ID constituting Cruel and Unusual Punishment 5th Amend "taking Clause" 8th Amend.

person is not permitted to have more than one valid driver's
license at any time. The department shall not issue to a person
to whom a current Minnesota identification card has been issued
a driver's license, other than a limited license, unless the
person's Minnesota identification card has been invalidated.

MS 171.02 DL validity

MS 171.16 30 days suspension the commissioner shall suspend the driver's license
of such person for 30 days for a refusal or failure to pay or
until notified by the court that the fine or surcharge, or both
if a fine and surcharge were not paid, has been paid http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/160.html

YOU BE THE JUDGE: READ THE ENTIRE
STATUTES: ALSO THE ANNOTATED
THANKS: WITH HIGH REGARD FOR OUR COUNTRY
IN-OUT-LAW ATTORNEY PRO SE_ IN FACT
MS 481.02 Unauthorized practice law


Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefsAOL Olmstead v. US GovLawbreaker Vision America:

Previous Posts

About Me

Name: Sharon Anderson

Location: St. Paul, Minnesota, United States

Do a google: Tells it all

View my complete profile

---